Posts Tagged ‘false flag’

On August 31, 1939, German SS operatives perpetrated a false flag attack to create an excuse for invading Poland. 

Most of what we know of the attack, known as the Gleiwitz Incident, was revealed in an affidavit by SS-Sturmbannführer Alfred Naujocks during the Nurumberg Trials. Naujocks admitted that he organized the event under orders from Heinrich Müller, chief of the Gestapo. 

The German radio station, Slender Gleiwitz in Gleiwitz, Germany (part of Poland since 1945) was attacked late at night by men wearing complete polish uniforms, led by Alfred Naujocks. After the invaders took the station, an anti-German message was broadcast in Polish. The content of the broadcast is uncertain and disputed today. 

Afterwards, a body was provided as evidence to local police and press that the attack was the work of anti-German, Polish saboteurs. The body belonged to Franciszek Honiok, a 43-year-old unmarried German Silesian Catholic farmer. Honiok was a known Polish sympathizer. He was not, however, a part of the assault on the station. In reality, he had been arrested by the Gestoapo the previous day. He was dressed in the uniform and murdered via lethal injection by his captors. He was then taken to the scene and shot multiple times and left dead. 

Honiok was not alone, several other prisoners at the Dachau concentration camp were kept for this purpose. These patsies were referred to by the code name Konserve, or “canned goods” in English. 

During the Nuremberg Trials Erwin von Lahousen stated that his division of the Abwehr (one of Germany’s intelligence gathering agencies) was ordered to procure the Polish uniforms, equipment and identification cards used in the operation. 

The Gleiwitz incident was a small part of a larger operation carried out by Abwehr and SS forces, dubbed Operation Himmler. It involved several other orchestrated attacks along the German-Polish border at the same time, designed to give the appearance of Polish aggression. 

Setting up the context for this false flag, Hitler had been claiming for months that Poland was organizing and tolorating the ethnic cleansing of ethnic Germans living in Poland. Furthermore, on August 22nd Hitler reportedly told his generals, “I will provide a propagandistic casus belli. (Latin meaning “incident that leads to war”) Its credibility doesn’t matter. The victor will not be asked whether he told the truth.”

The day following the Gleiwitz incident, Septmeber 1st, 1939, Germany launched operation Fall Weiss, the invasion of Poland. Though the incident gave Hitler his casus belli, it did not convince the international public. American correspondents came on the scene the next day but no neutral parties were allowed to investigate the incident in detail, leading to scepticism of Germany’s version of events. At any rate, Germany still invaded Poland and thrust Europe into the Second World War. If not for the Allied victory and the Nuremburg Trials we may have never learned the True Storey of what happened that night 76 years ago. 

If you enjoyed this piece, please share it with your friends on Facebook and Twitter. And don’t forget to leave a comment at the bottom and let us know what you think. 


They are calling it Benghazi-gate because of the cover up but in truth this “scandal” is in a whole other league from Watergate. Nixon was impeached and he resigned because of the cover up of his ordering of break-ins to steal the psychological records of his competition. The funny thing is that today the government reads our e-mails and records all our calls, among other things, and it’s no big deal. It’s actually not that funny but I’m getting off topic…. The difference, and what makes Benghazi so much worse is that not one single person was killed in those break-ins or the subsequent coverup.

Almost eight months have passed since the attack on the consulate in Benghazi and we are just now beginning to get some semblance of truth from the testimonies of these whistleblowers. Yesterday, Greg Hicks, the deputy chief of mission in Libya who became the top U.S. diplomat in the country after the slaughter of Ambassador Chris Stevens, told the House Government Oversight Committee that not only was the attack on 9/11/12 an act of terrorism, but that officials knew it immediately, that the administration had been warned of a deteriorating security situation, and that on the night of the attack “it appeared some were trying to lure even more U.S. personnel into a separate ‘ambush’ while the attack was still being carried out.”

Hicks also said he had been contacted early by Stevens, and that the ambassador told him, “Greg, we are under attack.” It would be the last time Hicks would hear from Stevens alive.

This is a huge story, historical even, because Hick’s testimony along with the others are completely contradicting the administration’s narrative of the “offensive video” starting a spontaneous protest that turned ugly. What makes the administration look worse is the fact that this nonsense about a YouTube video wasn’t just bad information that they received only to be withdrawn latter, this shows that it was BS from the beginning and they knew it was BS all along. Hicks noted that before Rice went on her round-robin of television appearances on Sept. 16, he had never heard of the video and that the ambassador never mentioned any demonstration before he died.

“I was stunned,” Hicks said of Rice’s comments. “My jaw dropped, and I was embarrassed.” He added that Rice never bothered to talk to him before she made those appearances. Neither did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton before Rice went on. And Obama couldn’t be bothered; after all, he was in the middle of an election.

Also reveled at the hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Benghazi was an e-mail from Beth Jones, the acting assistant secretary of state for Near East Affairs. The September 12 email—disclosed for the first time on Wednesday—said Jones had spoken to Libya’s ambassador to Washington who said the attack was the work of former Gadhafi regime loyalists. Jones said she told the ambassador: “The group that conducted the attacks, Ansar al-Sharia, is affiliated with Islamic terrorists.”

So we know for sure now that they lied about the video and knew the whole time that it was a premeditated attack. That’s great but what about the fact that this attack lasted for eight hours and we sent our people no help?

There were F-16 fighter jets just across the Mediterranean 1,000 miles away at Aviano Air Base in Italy. There were armed predator drones at 20,000 feet in the area. There was a CIA base right up the street. There was a four man team of Army special forces getting ready to leave on a Libyan C-130 cargo plane from Tripoli to Benghazi when they were told to stand down. There were two aircraft carriers relatively close by. The question is no longer if there was a stand down ordered, but why it was ordered and who ordered it.

Was it simply a “failure of leadership” as Dick Cheney said or was this a deliberate order from the very top to do nothing, effectively signing those four death warrants? As of right now we have no clear answer to any of those questions. There are a few things that I find interesting enough to put together a possible theory.

For starters we have the State Department trying desperately to cover up the truth about what happened that night. Greg Hicks testified yesterday that he was discouraged from talking to anyone from Congress by the State Department’s lawyers just before Trey Goudy (R-SC) came to Libya to investigate what had happened. We have also heard from Hillary Clinton during her testimony saying, shouting rather, “Why does it matter,” when she was pressed about her role in the stand down.

There is also the fact that we had a nice little weapons cache there in Benghazi that included SA-7 heat seeking missiles and rocket propelled grenades. It just so happens that Al Qaeda has released videos of themselves with a bunch of SA-7 missiles bragging about getting them from America.

It is widely known that the US is supplying weapons to what the media is calling the rebel forces in Syria. They call them the rebels because calling them what they really are wouldn’t sound so good. These rebels have pledged their allegiance to and are being led by none other than Al Qaeda.

The CIA mission in Benghazi was to find and acquire heavy arms seized in the overthrow of Gaddafi. It has been reported by CSN that Benghazi was a base for running guns to the Syrian rebels. For more on the connection between Stevens, Libya, the Free Syria Army, and Al Qaeda check out this article

So to sum all this up…

We supported the Al Qaeda forces in Libya to overthrow Gaddafi and install a puppet Al Qaeda supported government. We are now supplying the FSA, who is chock full of Al Qaeda, with heavy weapons, using Benghazi as a base of operations. Ambassador Stevens was most likely aware of the gun running and was probably involved in the process. He was attacked and killed in what appears to be an inside job involving his hired security team and Al Qaeda linked terrorists. Any and all chance of rescue or back up for the Ambassador was ordered to stand down. The State Department created a narrative of the events that was anything but accurate and stuck with that story as long as they could before bending on it falling back on the “faulty information” excuse. They continue to cover up the truth by avoiding questions and telling people not to talk to Congress.

I don’t know what our government is hiding in this whole ordeal but they definitely are trying to hide something huge. Is it the gun running? Did they set up the attack? Did they want Chris Stevens dead? Or is there something even more sinister at work?

Keep your eyes peeled and hopefully we’ll find out soon..


With a new major tragedy comes new conspiracy theories. The Boston Marathon Bombing is no exception to the rule. The difference with this incident is that the whirlwind of conspiracy is turning into a F-5 tornado. I’ve never seen such widespread interest in the unofficial explanations of a terror attack before. In fact, notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ website has had a reported 5x increase in visits, jumping from 1 to 5million a day since the 15th.

For some people, when they hear “conspiracy theory” their brain automatically calls up an image of some paranoid, backwoods weirdo. Which is what the government wants you to think of. If you automatically disregard anything you hear that is labeled a conspiracy theory you won’t ever question the motives of your government and you will be a good little sheep. I know what you are thinking, “True Storey you are sounding like a paranoid, backwoods weirdo now.” Good sheep.

Do you know where the term “conspiracy theory” came from? None other than the king of conspiracies, paranoia, and cover-ups himself J Edgar Hoover coined the term when he claimed that (get this) organized crime did not exist. That’s right, the first ever conspiracy theory was that the mafia was real, turns out J. Edgar was full of it. Some of you might be asking yourselves, “Why would the FBI create a term that discredits people?” See, now you’re starting to wake up. Because they didn’t want anyone to believe that there was a mafia, and the best way to accomplish that was by discrediting anyone who said otherwise without actually having to use facts to prove them wrong.

There are actually different kinds of conspiracies and one is called a false flag. This is where a government stages an event and blames it on someone else usually for political purposes.

Example: Let’s say that you are the United States government and you want to eliminate the second amendment and ban guns. To do that you would have to have the publics support and the best way to rally support is by tugging those heart strings. So, you set up this top secret operation with the ATF to sell military style firearms to Mexican drug cartels (aka organized crime) across the border. When those weapons are then used to murder innocent people you plaster all over the news that, because of the second amendment, guns are going to Mexico and being used to kill innocent women and children. You release pictures of dead children and publicize them and personalize them and get those heart strings going, then introduce stricter gun control legislation, hoping you’ll have garnered enough support to get what you want. The down side is that you may get caught, in which case you lie. You say it was all a botched sting operation and you were supposed to be able to track the firearms straight to the cartels secret hide out, but you forgot to put the tracking devices in the guns. Then, when there’s an investigation, you give an executive order to keep all the documents closed. Sound familiar?

For a little more about false flags and the history of them click —-»here.

The Boston attack is being looked at as a false flag operation. The consensus seems to be that there was a “drill” going on as the cover so that if caught they would have an excuse. There are pictures that show three different groups of patsies. One picture appears to be rednecks, whom they could use to blame the bombings on right wingers. Another is a group of middle easterners and then the two that ended up getting the blame. They hire these people to participate in their drill and then give them real bombs and set them up.

Last week they said that they had caught the suspect, and I believe they were going to blame the tea party patsy, until they saw all the outcry about this being a false flag. So, they canceled the press conference and switched the story to the two Russians, who were allegedly trained by the same terrorist organization that the State Department funds, the one they gave over a billion dollars to in the last two and a half years.

Then they catch the first guy who they just happened to run over in a SUV and shoot full of lead. Later they find the second suspect hiding in a boat. He is still alive but, surprisingly, he has a tracheotomy and can’t talk. They admit that they are heavily drugging him up and are talking about torturing him, you know, so he will tell the “truth”. If I remember correctly this guy is an American citizen and that means he has constitutional rights. They hope to drum up enough hate towards this teenage kid that the public will be all for torturing an American Citizen. If we let them do this, what will stop them from torturing anyone deemed a terrorist or enemy of the state?

That’s why they did this. They use fear and terror to convince you that, in order to “protect” us they have to infringe on our rights. They want to put security checkpoints and TSA agents at every sporting event, every festival, eeverywhere. You will have to let a stranger molest you every time you go to a baseball game or a concert or a rally.

So, ignore all of this if you dare. Will you let tyranny come to America with your head in the sand or will you be one who stands and resists?

“Those who sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither.” -Thomas Jefferson

“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” -James Madison