Posts Tagged ‘gun control’

There are so many stories and scandals involving corruption, cover-ups, and espionage in the news that it is easy to get bogged down and become distracted. Barack Obama and Eric Holder are both under a lot of scrutiny right now. Couple that with the failure of their most recent gun control legislation and one may be lead to believe that their attack on our second amendment might be placed on the back burner for the time being, but not so fast.

While talking to NPR’s Carrie Johnson, the top dog in the Justice Department made it clear that the losing endeavor of expanded background checks won’t be the White House’s last attempt to infringe upon that which shall not be infringed upon.

Holder said that they will not only try again to push “gun control” through congress later this year, but they will also be using their “regulatory power to make smaller changes in the meantime.”

This confirms that the administration will not relent on this issue as long as they are still at the helm. He also claimed that the goal is “moving the needle in the way in which the American people want, which is to make guns less accessible to people that should not have them.”

That sounds like a goal that any American might support. The problem, however, is that vague part at the end about the people who shouldn’t have them. He says this is what the American people want, but it won’t be the people deciding who doesn’t deserve access to the second amendment – it will be the tyrants.

I have covered the fact that Tea Partiers and conservatives have been labeled terror threats, and we already know about the government showing special attention to conservative groups through the IRS. Based on what we already know about all of this, how far of a reach would it be to think they might label any opposition as the “people that should not have them?”

Just a few weeks ago Eric Holder made it clear that gun control is still a keystone, and that resistance from the states will not be tolerated by sending a letter, dated April 26, to Kansas Governor Sam Brownback. The letter was in response to a bill signed into law by Gov. Brownback that declared:

It is unlawful for any official, agent or employee of the government of the United States, or employee of a corporation providing services to the government of the United States to enforce or attempt to enforce any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States regarding a firearm, a firearm accessory, or ammunition that is manufactured commercially or privately and owned in the state of Kansas and that remains within the borders of Kansas. Violation of this section is a severity level 10 nonperson felony.

Attorney General Holder did not take kindly to this new law. He wrote Gov. Brownback saying:

In purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of federal officers, SB102 directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional.

Other than finding this whole thing to be just a tad bit ironic, I wonder if AG Holder would have made the same argument after the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act was disputed by several northern states who criminalized federal agents attempting to kidnap people in their state. I would love to see him dispute states rights in that case.

Though we do need to keep pressing on Benghazi, the IRS, and the AP scandals, this should serve as a reminder to not let these weasels slip around the back door with some gun control legislation or executive order. It also reminds us that the current administration will not stop their assault on our constitution until they are brought to justice for their crimes against the trust of the American people and removed from office.



With a new major tragedy comes new conspiracy theories. The Boston Marathon Bombing is no exception to the rule. The difference with this incident is that the whirlwind of conspiracy is turning into a F-5 tornado. I’ve never seen such widespread interest in the unofficial explanations of a terror attack before. In fact, notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ website has had a reported 5x increase in visits, jumping from 1 to 5million a day since the 15th.

For some people, when they hear “conspiracy theory” their brain automatically calls up an image of some paranoid, backwoods weirdo. Which is what the government wants you to think of. If you automatically disregard anything you hear that is labeled a conspiracy theory you won’t ever question the motives of your government and you will be a good little sheep. I know what you are thinking, “True Storey you are sounding like a paranoid, backwoods weirdo now.” Good sheep.

Do you know where the term “conspiracy theory” came from? None other than the king of conspiracies, paranoia, and cover-ups himself J Edgar Hoover coined the term when he claimed that (get this) organized crime did not exist. That’s right, the first ever conspiracy theory was that the mafia was real, turns out J. Edgar was full of it. Some of you might be asking yourselves, “Why would the FBI create a term that discredits people?” See, now you’re starting to wake up. Because they didn’t want anyone to believe that there was a mafia, and the best way to accomplish that was by discrediting anyone who said otherwise without actually having to use facts to prove them wrong.

There are actually different kinds of conspiracies and one is called a false flag. This is where a government stages an event and blames it on someone else usually for political purposes.

Example: Let’s say that you are the United States government and you want to eliminate the second amendment and ban guns. To do that you would have to have the publics support and the best way to rally support is by tugging those heart strings. So, you set up this top secret operation with the ATF to sell military style firearms to Mexican drug cartels (aka organized crime) across the border. When those weapons are then used to murder innocent people you plaster all over the news that, because of the second amendment, guns are going to Mexico and being used to kill innocent women and children. You release pictures of dead children and publicize them and personalize them and get those heart strings going, then introduce stricter gun control legislation, hoping you’ll have garnered enough support to get what you want. The down side is that you may get caught, in which case you lie. You say it was all a botched sting operation and you were supposed to be able to track the firearms straight to the cartels secret hide out, but you forgot to put the tracking devices in the guns. Then, when there’s an investigation, you give an executive order to keep all the documents closed. Sound familiar?

For a little more about false flags and the history of them click —-»here.

The Boston attack is being looked at as a false flag operation. The consensus seems to be that there was a “drill” going on as the cover so that if caught they would have an excuse. There are pictures that show three different groups of patsies. One picture appears to be rednecks, whom they could use to blame the bombings on right wingers. Another is a group of middle easterners and then the two that ended up getting the blame. They hire these people to participate in their drill and then give them real bombs and set them up.

Last week they said that they had caught the suspect, and I believe they were going to blame the tea party patsy, until they saw all the outcry about this being a false flag. So, they canceled the press conference and switched the story to the two Russians, who were allegedly trained by the same terrorist organization that the State Department funds, the one they gave over a billion dollars to in the last two and a half years.

Then they catch the first guy who they just happened to run over in a SUV and shoot full of lead. Later they find the second suspect hiding in a boat. He is still alive but, surprisingly, he has a tracheotomy and can’t talk. They admit that they are heavily drugging him up and are talking about torturing him, you know, so he will tell the “truth”. If I remember correctly this guy is an American citizen and that means he has constitutional rights. They hope to drum up enough hate towards this teenage kid that the public will be all for torturing an American Citizen. If we let them do this, what will stop them from torturing anyone deemed a terrorist or enemy of the state?

That’s why they did this. They use fear and terror to convince you that, in order to “protect” us they have to infringe on our rights. They want to put security checkpoints and TSA agents at every sporting event, every festival, eeverywhere. You will have to let a stranger molest you every time you go to a baseball game or a concert or a rally.

So, ignore all of this if you dare. Will you let tyranny come to America with your head in the sand or will you be one who stands and resists?

“Those who sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither.” -Thomas Jefferson

“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” -James Madison

Charlton Heston, who died in 2008, was a great American, which also made him one of the last of a dying breed. Monday Jim Carrey, the great Canadian, released a video on Funny or Die mocking Mr. Heston and gun owners in general. It was Heston who made the famous NRA speech where he proclaimed that controllers would have to pry his firearms “from my cold, dead hands”, which is also Carrey’s punch line in his song.

In his video Carrey does a spoof of “Hee Haw” where he impersonates Mr. Heston and also plays the lead singer in a mock country western band. Carrey sings, “Charlton Heston movies are no longer in demand, and his immortal soul may lay forever in the sand. The angels wouldn’t take him up to heaven like he planned, because they couldn’t pry the gun from his cold dead hand.” Carrey basically says that Heston went to hell when he died because he was the president of the NRA. He accuses Charlton of being a murder, responsible for the deaths of all the children at Sandy Hook.

Charlton Heston has taken a lot of flack, to say the least, from the left over the years, which is something to be expected in today’s America. But for Jim Carrey to celebrate and dance on the grave of anyone, let alone a man like Heston is completely over the line. For those of you who don’t know, let me give you a short bio on Charlton Heston.

In 60 years he appeared in over 100 films, most notably “The Ten Commandments” (1956), “Ben-Hur” (1959), and “Planet of the Apes” (1968). He was known as a spokes man for Christian morales and values and was known to reject scripts that did not emphasize responsibility, individualism and masculinity. Moving beyond Hollywood, he became nationally visible in 1963 in support of the Civil Rights bill, and in 1968 used his “cowboy” persona to publicize gun control measures. Charlton Heston was a man who marched with Martin Luther King and went to the south for sit-ins and protests. He was a strong, outspoken defender of all civil rights, unlike a lot of people today. He stood up for equal rights, the second amendment, and the first amendment. He was a civil rights activist before it was popular to be such.

Now, what has this man done in his life to deserve such hate and vitriol from the likes of Jim Carrey? I’ll tell you what this is about: Jim Carrey wants more attention. He is a washed up actor who was never even good at acting in the first place. He is famous for making an ass out of himself and making a few funny faces. There was a time when I thought the world of Jim Carrey, I wanted to be just like him. The thing is, I was 9 years old watching “Pet Detective” and “Dumb and Dumber” thinking that I was witnessing a genius at work. What I was actually seeing was a grown man act like a 9 year old. Sure he has done some serious roles in his career but who really thinks “Truman Show” was a good movie?

Not I.

The Democrats’ idea to avoid raising the debt ceiling by inventing a trillion dollar platinum coin has got me thinking. If they are seriously considering this as a viable option they must be hard up for good ideas, so I’ve decided to lead them a hand with a few ideas of my own on a few issues.

First the problem of government spending. Lets start by getting Congress to actually pass a budget. This may be a stretch but I was just thinking that if they were to pass a budget based on the actual amount of money they have coming in, we might not continue spending like it’s not their money. I know this idea is a little extreme since it is their job and all but it may help.

I also have some ideas to help fit all of the entitlement spending into this theoretical budget. Lets take welfare for instance. We could make it mandatory that people excepting welfare work. They should have to present their pay stub or stubs every month. If they fail to meet this requirement we give them a government job, on a road crew, or repairing government housing, or cutting grass, or picking up trash at a park, or whatever we can find them. For the people who have a child and have to get a check to support that child we will help them, because everyone makes mistakes, then we will also teach them about birth control. If they have another child and need more help raising those children, we will consider it child abuse and take those children and find parents that can take care of them. You want kids? get a job and take care of them. When it comes to food stamps, we reimburse grocery stores to put up special signs or some type of marker to signify which products can be purchased with the EBT card. We limit the recipient to the basics, no Little Debbie’s, no pricey cuts of meat, no expensive exotic fruits, and since the liberals are on their health kick why not limit them to healthy foods and no “sugary drinks”, no “sugary cereals”. I’ve went over my thoughts on disability and the like before so I’ll move on.

One of the hot topics today is gun control to try and limit mass shootings, and I’ve got the solution. First we take anyone who has sworn an oath to protect the constitution and has actively tried to limit the right to own a firearm and we try them as a traitors to the constitution. Since we already stopped rewarding single mothers for popping out an endless supply of government dependents, which is a big part of the problem, I think having less neglected youths will really help with the angry, mentally disturbed teens. Furthermore we should have a police officer in every school, and he/she needs to be armed with the standard issue sidearm, taser gun, pepper spray, and hand cuffs, because the people who commit these murders always chose a place that they know won’t have anyone who can stand up to them. They do this because they want to feel in control of these people, they decide who lives and who dies, an armed officer in the building will prevent them from fulfilling their fantasy.

I’ve also got an idea for gay marriage. Quite simply really, lets make a compromise. Let the jokers get married, just give it a different name so that marriage is still man and woman. Let them have their benefits, what harm can it cause? Some Christians would say that legalizing gay marriage would cause America to lose God’s favor, but honestly letting gays play house won’t change anything for any straight people. Whether they are married or not they will still be doing what they do, but if the Republican Party stops dictating what people can do with their lives, something we like to attribute to liberals, we may win an election.

If you have any ideas of your own you can share them with the whole world in the comment section down below, who knows you might come up with a gem like the trillion dollar coin!


I’ve just about heard all I can stand to hear about gun control. In an earlier post I explained that the gun show “loophole” doesn’t exist. It’s just an attempt at twisting public opinion. They call it a loophole because that word received the desired feedback in the focus groups, while coming out and saying “we want to ban the sale of firearms by private individuals” wasn’t well received.

That’s one of the lies they like to use, but not the only one. They like to tell us that we need to do this for our own protection. They say that we can’t sit around and let another Sandy Hook happen. Well good ol’ Piers Morgan had his second little town hall gun debate/witch hunt. At the beginning of the show he outright admitted that the regulations Obama is proposing, and he supports, will not prevent mass shootings, but he went on to say that this is the perfect time to put these things in place in the shadow of Sandy Hook even if the are only symbolic.

Democrats have been arguing that we have to restrict our rights so that we can prevent future tragedies knowing full well that they were full of it.

Obama jokes that “nobody is going to come take your guns away next week” as if his opposition on this point are all just paranoid. We know they won’t come for them next week or next month even, because they can’t yet. They have to follow the steps first.

First, they’ll limit your right to bear arms little by little as much as they can. Cut down magazine size, limit caliber, make weapons they deem too dangerous illegal. That type of thing.
Second, they will make the private sale of firearms illegal. They’ll do this by making background checks that private individuals can’t preform mandatory, or they may just come out and be honest. Haha
Third, they will make registration mandatory with steep fines and jail time for possession of an unregistered weapon.
Finally they will make possession illegal and have a deadline for handing over your arms, and since you are in their database they will be at your house the following day if you don’t turn in your weapons.

It may sound crazy but all you have to do is look back in history to see that it can and has happened all over the world, and not just in third world countries. In 1938 Berlin was considered the most progressive, and cultured city in the world. I bet there were a lot of people calling the Jews crazy when they started fleeing Germany, I bet a lot of those same people ended up in camps wishing they’d listened to their neighbor when they moved to America.

They are eroding our freedom little by little, killing the constitution slowly.


Every once and a while I like to torture myself by listening to Ed Schultz, or some other liberal goober, while I’m at work. Today was one of those days and the “hot topic” is an “assault weapons ban”.

I listened to Ed’s callers say everything from the NRA should be treated like a terrorist organization, to one guy who said he is so upset about the violence that he would go along with any law that might put an end to school shootings.

I really don’t understand how people can be so ignorant. These people are willing to let our rights be slowly eroded out of the fear that the media is pushing.

When we start letting the federal government restrict our rights to “keep us safe” where will it stop? If it is ok to chip away the second amendment because it will keep us all safe, what’s next?

I’m sure a lot of you have seen these facts before, but being that I like to look back in history when talking about present issues, I’ll share them again.

  • In 1911 Turkey enacted “gun control” and from 1915-1917 around 1.5 million Armenians were slaughtered
  • Soviet Russia established “gun control” in 1929, subsequently, an estimated 20 million “enemies of the state” were rounded up and killed from 1929-1953
  • Under the Nazis, Germany initiated “gun control” in 1938, which lead to the elimination of over 13 million Jews, gays, mentally ill, union leaders, Catholics, and political opponents from 1938-1945
  • Between 1948 and 1953, China rounded up and murdered 20 million dissidents after establishing “gun control” in 1935
  • If you were an educated person in Cambodia from 1975-1977 then you must be dead, because after locking in “gun control” in 1956 over a million “educated” people were killed
  • “Gun control” came to Guatemala in 1964. From 1964-1981 over 100,000 Mayan Indians were hunted down and killed
  • Uganda bought into “gun control” in 1970, in less than a decade, 300,000 people were murdered for their Christian faith
  • What do these people have in common? All 56,000,000 of them were murdered in the last century and were unable to defend themselves because of “gun control”.

    The government should not be allowed to put an “assault weapons” ban in place because we have those weapons to protect ourselves from the government. Don’t let the government tell you what’s best for you. Don’t be another sheep that follows along, all the way to slaughter.


    And for a limited time only, if you subscribe and are unhappy with my services, you can return the unused portion and get a 100% refund, all I ask is that you cover the shipping and handling fees.